Contracts depend on all parties understanding what they are agreeing to. That's the starting point for privacy policy reform.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case that could allow states to force businesses in other states to collect internet sales taxes for them, not because of declining state revenues, but because of increased state spending.

When government charges a dedicated fee (or tax), the money should go for that purpose—especially when people's lives may depend on it—and not be siphoned off for unrelated purposes.

The FCC has ended the Obama era's net neutrality drive, which means freedom, innovation and opportunity, not government, will once again drive the internet's future. 

Certain advocacy groups are intentionally spreading misleading information about net neutrality, which could lead to greater damage than just their credibility.

Several recent natural disasters created real challenges for the communications industry, and yet it responded quickly and efficiently minimizing disruptions and, most importantly, saving lives.

The future is coming. Whether it is “jobless” may well depend on steps we take now.

Regardless of your political orientation, if we want to prevent the police state of the future, we must strongly oppose every incremental move that threatens our Fourth Amendment protections.

For a Congress floundering on health care and in need of proof that its dysfunction is not terminal, fixing our data privacy could be just what the doctor ordered.

By making policy, instead of simply implementing and enforcing policy, the FCC has usurped the role of Congress, and people are responding accordingly.