Publications

Bush advanced personal accounts for Social Security during his 2000 campaign, focusing solely on the personal accounts and their benefits for working people, and contrasting them with the alternatives of tax increases and benefit cuts. But once elected, he allowed this reform model to be displaced by tax increases and benefit cuts as the core of reform, with personal accounts as the “dessert.” This left the reform without the grassroots appeal to overcome the opposition on such a politically sensitive issue as Social Security.

So what do you do if you’re Barack Obama and you’ve just been elected president of the United States and you’ve promised to spend a gazillion dollars to improve education and health care and the infrastructure and to hand out “tax cuts” (many of which will actually be income transfers) to 95 percent of the public? And you’re fiscally constrained because the government is bailing out or buying out banks left and right? What you need is some serious new inflows of cash, you need it fast, and, contrary to everything you’ve claimed on the campaign trail, you know you can’t get it all by dinging the people making over $250k.

Before the financial mess, Congress was debating a bill that would establish new rules for an incredibly promising field of medical technology.

As best we can tell, the free market had little or nothing to do with the banking crisis that has caused panic throughout the world.

So you thought Congress may have learned its lesson about creating huge entities that will need to be bailed out at taxpayer expense? If you did, you were wrong.

Because so many members of Congress have drunk deeply from the big-spending troughs of Washington—especially after many of them campaigned as fiscal hawks—we think it’s time for them to step forward, confess their failures and get right with the U.

On September 25 the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee held a hearing to learn about current practices by broadband providers to protect a person’s “privacy.

The U.

New York Times columnist Thomas L.

Rather than stifling regulatory competition by centralizing regulation, insurance companies should be allowed to choose between an optional federal charter and mutual recognition among state regulators. Such expansion would create a 21st century regulatory system in which they can be globally competitive and better serve the American consumer.