Senate filibuster repeal or reform is being considered once again. Returning to the “talking filibuster” wouldn’t change the 60 votes needed to end debate, but it could expedite the process.
Democrats propose ending the Senate filibuster to push through their far-left agenda. Some of them want to bring back earmarks for the same reason.
How did the man who would be president find himself in such a mess? By turning a pandemic crisis into a social justice effort.
The left and the media have long decried the vast amounts of money spent on political campaigns even as Democrats blow the lid off past spending records, without a word of complaint.
Trump doesn’t have to win the Latino and Black vote, just sufficiently grow the GOP’s usually minuscule share. If recent polls are accurate, it’s likely a game changer—both for this election and for the Republican Party.
Preexisting medical conditions were a real problem for a small number of uninsured individuals. But the political debate is no longer about how best to address that problem, but how to hammer a political opponent.
Given the potential for mismanagement, misinformation and unintended error–and we’re not even discussing the possibility of fraud–it’s astonishing that the media keep trying to reassure voters that mail-in ballots are a safe and secure way to ensure their vote is counted.
A broad community of stakeholders, representing freemarket, family, faith, education, business, and judicial interests come together to speak with a clear and singular voice.
In the November 2020 election, voters will decide between candidates with widely different visions of American health care, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trump tried to calm the public during a pandemic and sound an optimistic note that the country is slowly returning to normal—and the media consider that a bad thing.